The Victims

Stories of Those Harmed by Glen Frost's Unjust Enrichment

Profiles of the Plaintiffs

Three Men Defrauded of Rightful Commissions

The jury found that Glen Frost's Strategic Tax Planning unjustly enriched itself at the expense of three hardworking individuals who brought valuable clients to the company. Despite clear agreements, Frost's firm refused to pay what was owed, forcing these men to fight for years in court to receive justice.

George Divel III

Residence: Florida

Role: Brought numerous clients to Strategic Tax Planning seeking Employment Retention Credit services

Jury Award: $434,025 (Unjust Enrichment)
"We had clear agreements about compensation for the clients I brought in. Glen Frost personally assured me I would be taken care of, then completely reneged on our deal."

Divel's substantial award reflects the significant business he generated for Frost's company, and the jury's recognition that Strategic Tax Planning benefited enormously from his efforts without proper compensation.

Gary Stastny

Residence: Florida

Role: Referral partner who introduced multiple businesses to Strategic Tax Planning

Jury Award: $233,565 (Unjust Enrichment)
"The text messages don't lie. Frost promised us commissions, then used every legal trick to avoid paying what he owed. It was never about the contracts - it was about doing what's right."

Stastny's case demonstrated how Frost's companies would change commission structures and find excuses not to pay, even after benefiting from the referred clients' business.

Chris Callaway

Residence: Anne Arundel County

Role: Local business consultant who partnered with Strategic Tax Planning

Jury Award: $16,353 (Breach of Contract)
"As a local businessman, I trusted Frost's reputation. I never imagined I'd have to sue one of our county's most prominent attorneys just to get paid what I was promised."

While Callaway's award was smaller, his breach of contract victory established important legal precedent about verbal agreements and ethical business practices in Maryland.

The Emotional & Financial Toll

Beyond the financial damages, the plaintiffs described the personal toll of fighting this legal battle against a powerful attorney and his network of companies:

  • Years of stress and uncertainty while the case moved through the courts
  • Financial strain from unpaid commissions that affected their businesses and families
  • The emotional burden of being betrayed by someone they considered a professional partner
  • Time and resources spent on litigation that could have been used to grow their businesses

The jury's verdict not only compensated these victims financially, but also validated their claims and exposed Glen Frost's unethical business practices to public scrutiny.

Legal Representation

Plaintiffs' Attorney: Timothy Mummert

Mummert successfully argued that the independent contractor agreement offered to his clients was inadequate, and that the parties had agreed to "figure this out later." He demonstrated how the commission percentage was "constantly changing" to the plaintiffs' disadvantage.

"(The jury) saw this case for what it was, and we believe justice was served," Mummert told The Daily Record after the verdict.